The Rugby Ref has no connection with the firm concerned, but feels that anything that contributes to player safety is worth looking at. The article below was submitted by Vicki Power.
Televised Match Officials and the
Role of the Referee
The role of the Rugby referee is changing due to changes in
the laws and an emphasis being put on player safety and health.
Concussion
bin
Last year the International Rugby Board (IRB) introduced the
Concussion bin in a trial period in the (then) Aviva Premiership. This allowed players who
had sustained
a collision or head injury to be assessed off the field. A temporary substitute
is put into the game for 5 minutes while the assessment is taking place. If the
player is fit and well, he can then return to the game. If he presents symptoms
of a concussion he will remain out of the game and the temporary substitute
becomes permanent.
Televised
Match Officials (TMO)
In addition to the introduction of the concussion bin, the IRB
allowed for more use of video technology during televised games. Previously,
the video was used to assess whether a try had been scored, but the change allowed
for the referee (in certain competitions) to consult the Television Match
Official (TMO) with regards to foul play or personal injury, and also allowed
the TMO to alert the referee of any incidents they may have missed.
There are mixed feelings on the use of TMO with some saying
that it takes away the charm of rugby and the role of the referee and can be
seen as a cop out on the referee’s part.
But, the results from the trial period appear, at this
point, to be positive.
NB: The Rugby Ref says "anything that helps remove foul play from the game, and helps the referee make the correct decision should be welcomed, but the referee must remain the sole judge of fact and of law".
Referees have a great responsibility when they step onto the
pitch. They must ensure that players and coaches comply with the laws of the
game and that the integrity of the sport is upheld and that can only be
assisted, at the highest levels, with the use of video technology.
Injury
Surveillance Report
A recent report
produced by the Rugby Football Union (RFU), highlighted the severity and
frequency of specific injuries within the sport.
The study is commissioned by the Rugby Football Union and
Premier Rugby Ltd and was first conducted in 2002. The study is now the largest
of its kind and is used to assess professional rugby union injuries and
training practises throughout the world.
Most
Common cause of Injury
The report went into great detail of the causes of injuries
during a match and what came out on top was Tackles.
The most common injuries to be sustained from a tackle are:
Thigh injuries, knee injuries, other leg injuries and sternal injury to the
ball carrier. Clavicle injuries, concussion and cervical nerve root injury to
the tackler.
Tackles are all lumped under the same bracket, the report
does not go into detail of illegal tackles or foul play, which explains the
wide variety of injuries associated with this action.
NB: The Rugby Ref says "rugby is a collision sport and injuries are inevitable, but lets remove the dangerous and foul play, that produces preventable injuries".
When
officiating a match, an additional role of the match officials, referee and
coaches is to ensure the safety of the players. With the introduction of video
technology to help rule and spot unsportsmanlike behaviour, illegal tackles and
foul play, does this increase the responsibility placed on the referee? And, as
a result, does this place more liability on the referee and the match officials
when it comes to pointing fingers after an incident?
Robert Kitson , the Rugby Union
correspondent was quoted in The Guardian in 2012:
“If
a referee, or his assistants overreact in the heat of the moment it can ruin games
and tarnish careers in an instant”
NB: The Rugby Ref says "referees react to what the players do, referees don't break the law or commit foul play, they merely uphold the law. Let us be the best match officials we can be through training and assessments".
The
increased usage of video technology will help ensure that overreactions don’t
occur and will help result in a more agreeable and explainable decision, but
will the extra liability that it appears to place on the referee result in the
overall feeling toward the change being negative?
The Rugby Ref welcomes comments on this article.